English Language Arts
Grade 9
15 min
Decide whether ellipses are used appropriately
Decide whether ellipses are used appropriately
Tutorial Preview
1
Introduction & Learning Objectives
Learning Objectives
Identify the correct placement and punctuation for an ellipsis within a quotation.
Analyze a quoted passage to determine if an ellipsis alters the original author's intended meaning.
Evaluate whether an omission creates a grammatically awkward or incomplete sentence.
Correct quotations that use ellipses inappropriately by either restoring text or rephrasing the surrounding sentence.
Integrate shortened quotations using ellipses smoothly and ethically into their own analytical writing.
Differentiate between an ellipsis used for omission and one used to indicate a pause or trailing thought in creative writing.
Ever seen a movie poster with a critic's quote like '...an incredible... achievement!' and wondered what words were left out? 🤔...
2
Key Concepts & Vocabulary
TermDefinitionExample
EllipsisA set of three periods (...) used to indicate an intentional omission of a word, sentence, or whole section from a text without altering its original meaning.Original: 'The sun, a brilliant orb of fire, set slowly over the distant, hazy mountains.' With Ellipsis: 'The sun ... set slowly over the distant ... mountains.'
OmissionThe act of leaving something out. In the context of quotations, it refers to the specific words or phrases removed and replaced by an ellipsis.In the quote 'He argued that the plan was 'bold ... and necessary,'' the words 'ambitious, and perhaps even risky' were the omission.
Original MeaningThe author's intended message, argument, and tone in the original, complete text. The primar...
3
Key Rules & Conventions
The Golden Rule: Preserve Original Meaning
An ellipsis must never be used in a way that changes, misrepresents, or contradicts the author's original message.
This is the most important ethical rule. Before using an ellipsis, ask yourself: 'Does the quote still mean the same thing without the omitted words?' If the answer is no, you cannot use the ellipsis. This is especially true for words like 'not,' 'never,' or other qualifiers.
The Mid-Sentence Omission
To omit words from the middle of a single quoted sentence, place a single, space-typed ellipsis (...) where the words were removed.
Use this when you want to remove a descriptive clause or an irrelevant phrase from the middle of a sentence to make your evidence more concise. The resulting...
4 more steps in this tutorial
Sign up free to access the complete tutorial with worked examples and practice.
Sign Up Free to ContinueSample Practice Questions
Challenging
A student is writing an essay with the thesis: 'In his speech, the senator prioritized economic growth over environmental protection.' Which use of a quote from the speech most effectively and ethically supports this thesis? Original Speech: 'While we must remain vigilant stewards of our natural resources, we cannot afford to sacrifice the economic well-being of our citizens by implementing costly regulations that stifle innovation and growth.'
A.The senator argues, 'we cannot afford to sacrifice the economic well-being of our citizens...'
B.The senator claims we must not 'sacrifice the economic well-being of our citizens by implementing costly regulations that stifle... growth.'
C.The senator states that 'we must remain vigilant stewards of our natural resources, [but] we cannot afford to sacrifice... economic well-being...'
D.The senator dismisses environmental concerns, stating 'we cannot afford to... implement... costly regulations...'
Challenging
Original Text: 'Although a minority of scientists still question the data, the overwhelming consensus in the peer-reviewed literature is that the climate is changing at an unprecedented rate.' An article quotes the text as: 'The overwhelming consensus in the peer-reviewed literature is that the climate is changing....' Why is this use of an ellipsis ethically problematic for a high-stakes debate?
A.It is not problematic; it accurately reports the main conclusion.
B.It is problematic because it omits the qualifying clause that acknowledges dissent, presenting the consensus as monolithic and silencing any opposing viewpoint.
C.It is problematic because it should have used brackets to change the verb tense.
D.It is problematic because it removes the phrase 'at an unprecedented rate,' which weakens the original claim.
Challenging
A student's draft reads: 'The author argues that the protagonist's choice was '...a necessary, if tragic, sacrifice for the greater good.'' This creates a 'Grammar-Breaker' because the quote doesn't fit the sentence. Which revision is the most skillful and correct?
A.The author argues that the protagonist's choice was, '...a necessary, if tragic, sacrifice for the greater good.'
B.The author describes the protagonist's choice as 'a necessary, if tragic, sacrifice for the greater good.'
C.The author argues that the protagonist's choice '[was] a necessary, if tragic, sacrifice for the greater good.'
D.The author argues that the protagonist made '...a necessary, if tragic, sacrifice for the greater good.'
Want to practice and check your answers?
Sign up to access all questions with instant feedback, explanations, and progress tracking.
Start Practicing Free